Current:Home > MarketsWhy officials aren't calling this year's new COVID shots "boosters" -Capitatum
Why officials aren't calling this year's new COVID shots "boosters"
Algosensey Quantitative Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-06 08:31:08
Earlier in the COVID-19 pandemic, as signs of waning immunity and changes in the virus prompted the rollout of additional doses of vaccine, health authorities took to urging Americans to seek out "booster" shots to improve their protection against the virus.
Now, with an updated vaccine formula rolling out for the fall, officials are changing that message to move away from the word "booster."
Instead, doctors and health departments are now working on getting used to calling this year's newly recommended shots the "2023-2024 COVID-19 vaccine" or simply the "updated COVID-19 vaccine."
- Looking for the new COVID vaccine booster? Here's where to get the shot.
Virtually all Americans ages 6 months and older are now recommended to get one dose of these updated shots from Moderna or Pfizer, regardless of what vaccines they have or have not received before.
"Bye bye, booster. We are no longer giving boosters, and it's going to be very difficult to stop using that word because that word has become pervasive," Dr. Keipp Talbot, a member of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's committee of vaccine advisers, said.
Talbot was speaking Thursday at a webinar hosted by the Infectious Diseases Society of America titled, in part, "COVID-19 New Booster Vaccine & Variants Update."
"We are beginning to think of COVID like influenza. Influenza changes each year, and we give a new vaccine for each year. We don't 'boost' each year," said Talbot.
No more "primary series"
The change in terminology stems from a proposal, first backed by a panel of the Food and Drug Administration's outside advisers back in January, to dramatically simplify the schedule of authorized and approved COVID-19 vaccines.
Most Americans originally received a "primary series" of shots that were targeted at the original strain of the virus early in the pandemic. Then, a mix of "booster" doses were offered — some targeted at more recent variants — with varying guidelines depending on a person's age and what shots they previously received.
That made it difficult for some people and their doctors to figure out whether they were "up to date" on their shots. Meanwhile, still-unvaccinated Americans who wanted to get caught up faced a need to get through the "primary series" doses of the old formula of vaccines before they could qualify for the latest versions of the shots.
The FDA took steps towards simplifying the regimen in April, phasing out the original versions of the vaccine and removing the "primary series" versus "booster" distinction for most people.
Later, when the FDA announced it was authorizing and approving the latest formulation of the vaccines on Monday, targeted for the XBB.1.5 strain of the virus, the agency's press release made no mention of "booster" doses.
"To clarify, these vaccines would not be considered 'boosters' per se. These vaccines, as previously announced, would be updated with a new formulation for the 2023-2024 fall and winter seasons," an FDA spokesperson said Thursday in an email.
Other federal authorities have hewed closely to the new terminology.
Statements from the White House and the Department of Health and Human Services also never used the word "booster" when touting new availability of these latest shots.
CDC polling on the new shots asked Americans simply if they were open to getting the "new, updated COVID-19 vaccine."
But the word "booster" still remains on many other official pages, including the United Kingdom's "autumn vaccine booster" campaign overseas and press releases within the U.S. from some state and local health departments.
"It's going to be difficult to start changing that terminology, but it is no longer a booster. It is now the current vaccine for the year," said Talbot.
- In:
- COVID-19 Vaccine
- COVID-19
CBS News reporter covering public health and the pandemic.
veryGood! (27239)
Related
- 'Kraven the Hunter' spoilers! Let's dig into that twisty ending, supervillain reveal
- Did the moose have to die? Dog-sledding risk comes to light after musher's act of self-defense
- Claudia Oshry Shares Side Effects After Going Off Ozempic
- Super Tuesday exit polls and analysis for the 2024 California Senate primary
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- Arkansas governor proposes $6.3B budget as lawmakers prepare for session
- Steely Dan keyboardist Jim Beard dies at 63 after sudden illness
- Concacaf Champions Cup Bracket: Matchups, schedule for round of 16
- 'Squid Game' without subtitles? Duolingo, Netflix encourage fans to learn Korean
- Embattled New York Community Bancorp announces $1B cash infusion
Ranking
- Tree trimmer dead after getting caught in wood chipper at Florida town hall
- Gangs in Haiti try to seize control of main airport as thousands escape prisons: Massacring people indiscriminately
- TikToker Remi Bader Just Perfectly Captured the Pain of Heartbreak
- ‘Rust’ armorer’s trial gives Alec Baldwin’s team a window into how his own trial could unfold
- Justice Department, Louisville reach deal after probe prompted by Breonna Taylor killing
- Steve Garvey advances in California senate primary: What to know about the former MLB MVP
- Mississippi lawmakers moving to crack down on machine gun conversion devices
- Saquon Barkley NFL free agency landing spots: Ranking 9 teams from most to least sensible
Recommendation
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
Kid Cudi announces INSANO World Tour: Here's how to get tickets
Inter Miami vs. Nashville in Champions Cup: How to watch, game predictions and more
Luck strikes twice for Kentucky couple who lost, then found, winning lottery ticket
What to watch: O Jolie night
You Only Have 66 Minutes To Get 66% off These 66 Gymshark Products- This Is Not a Drill
Stock market today: Asian shares trade mixed after Wall Street recovers
Florida set to ban homeless from sleeping on public property